Expert evidence in the process of effective collaboration: analysis of infringement of the right to contradiction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35290/rcui.v11n1.2023.997Keywords:
effective collaboration, expert evidence, principle of contradiction, criminal lawAbstract
The general objective of the article was to systematically analyze through literature review the impact of the violation of the right to contradiction in the process of effective collaboration that resorts to the use of expert evidence. The methodology used was qualitative, basic and with a systematic review design, so it had a sample of 6 articles related to the subject of the study. Regarding the results, it was determined that the expert evidence provides cognitions of other matters whose relationship with the Law increases the possibility of understanding the situation and resolving a trial in the most comprehensive way possible, for which the principle of contradiction must also be ascertained. On the other side, the inquiry was limited by not making constitutional comparisons with other legal systems to conceive the constant differences that imply conceptions to be taken into consideration; however, the value of the study lay in the recognition of the impact that the violation of the aforementioned right implies for companies and individuals according to their responsibility and the imputations for which they must respond. Finally, it was concluded that the adversarial principle is crucial for an integral judgment and should be reinforced when evidence is received from other branches of knowledge.
Downloads
References
Abbas, M. S. (2021). The dynamics of public interest litigation (PIL) in the perspective of adversarial legal system of Pakistan. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3760303 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3760303
Andersson, H. (2022). Access and cartel cases. Ensuring effective competition law enforcement. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Bauer, G., Churchill, S., Mahendran, M., Walwyn, C., Lizotte, D., & Villa-Rueda, A. (2021). Intersectionality in quantitative research: a systematic review of its emergence and applications of theory and methods. SSM - Population Health, 14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100798. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100798
Butcher, J., Gilchrist, D. J., Phillimore, J., & Wanna, J. (2019). Attributes of effective collaboration: insights from fivecase studies in Australia and New Zealand. Policy Design and Practice, 2(1), 75-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2018.1561815. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2018.1561815
Calahorrano, E. (2022). Razonamiento probatorio sobre la admisibilidad de la prueba pericial en responsabilidad médica. Revista de Derecho (Coquimbo), 29, 1-42. https://doi.org/10.22199/issn.0718-9753-3944. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22199/issn.0718-9753-3944
Citlak, A. (2021). Psychology of religion in the theories and research of the Lvov-Warsaw School (basic achievements and developments). Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 43(1), 95-116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0084672421990754. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0084672421990754
Da Silva, K., Ribeiro, M., Ulises de Queiroga, D., Pereira da Silva, I., & Soares, S. (2020). The use of multiple triangulations as a validation strategy in a qualitative study. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232020252.12302018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232020252.12302018
Dibarrart, M. (2019). Sobre la admisibilidad de la prueba testimonial mediante declaraciones juradas escritas en el marco del arbitraje doméstico y comercial internacional. Revista de Derecho, 87(246), 287-311. https://revistas.udec.cl/index.php/revista_de_derecho/article/view/1400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-591X2019000200287
Dos Santos Massoca, P., & Sonnewend, E. (2022). National policies encounter municipal realities: a critical analysis of the outcomes of the List of Priority Municipalities in curbing deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. World Development, 158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.106004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.106004
England, P. (2022). A practitioner's guide to the unified patent court and unitary patent. Bloomsbury Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509904204
Flint, D. (2022). God can do otherwise: a defense of act contingency in Leibniz's mature period. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 39(3), 235-256. https://doi.org/10.5406/21521026.39.3.03. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5406/21521026.39.3.03
García, M. (ed.). (2020). Lecturas sobre derecho del medio ambiente. Universidad Externado de Colombia.
Gutiérrez, M. (2022). El árbitro y la búsqueda de un equilibrio ante la inestabilidad del procedimiento. Aranzadi.
Khiessie, Q. (2021). Le contradictoire devant la Cour africaine des droits de l'homme et des peuples. En Pretoria University Law Press, Annuaire africain des droits de l'homme, V, pp. 51-72).
Lamy, A. (2019). Defining nature in medieval cosmological literature: the founding principle of contradiction in the Cosmographia of Bernardus Silvestris, the anonymous Placides et Timéo, and the Image du monde of Gossuin of Metz. Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies, 49(3), 457-478. https://doi.org/10.1215/10829636-7724613. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/10829636-7724613
Li, Y. (2022). The dilemma and countermeasures of public interest litigation of marine environmental pollution in China. Sustainability, 14(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114415
Ma, L., Yang, Z., Weng, H., & Zeng, X. (2020). Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? Military Medical Research, 7(7), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40779-020-00238-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40779-020-00238-8
Mugellini, G., Bella, S., Colagrossi, M., Isenring, G., & Killias, M. (2021). Public sector reforms and their impact on the level of corruption: a systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 17(2). https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1173
O'Brien, T., Hawkins, S., & Loesch, A. (2022). Scientific disciplines and the admissibility of expert evidence in courts. Socius, 8, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231221108044. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231221108044
Ollé, V., & Falguera, M. (2021). Practicum proceso laboral 2021. Aranzadi.
Organización Mundial de la Propiedad Intelectual. (2023). WIPO collection of leading judgments on intellectual property rights: members of the African Intellectual Property Organization (1997-2018).
Ortego, F. (2020). La evolución jurisprudencial del derecho del acusado a la última palabra. Ius et Praxis, 26(2), 320-332. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-00122020000200320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-00122020000200320
Pushkarsky, A. (2019). The fundamental law of thought: from Kant to Boole. Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, (51), 115-128. https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/51/12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/51/12
Porres, E., y Sosa, J. (2022). Derecho judicial. El derecho de creación judicial a la luz del siglo XXI. Bosch Editor.
Ramos, F. (2021). La influencia de la Constitución en el derecho procesal civil. En J. Picó i Junoy, La evolución del derecho procesal a la luz de Justicia. 40 años de historia (págs. 751-784). J.M. Bosch Editor. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2k0582h.29
Rudd, G., Meissel, K., & Meyer, F. (2021). Measuring academic resilience in quantitative research: a systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100402
Ruiz, F. (2022). El proceso contencioso-administrativo (12. ª ed.). Aranzadi.
Solodov, D. (2023). The judicial assessment of expert evidence in Polish criminal procedure. Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal, 9(1), 427-456. https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v9i1.785. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v9i1.785
Subijana, I., y Echeburúa, E. (2022). El conflicto de roles con respecto a la prueba pericial psicológica en el proceso judicial. Anuario de Psicología Jurídica, 32(1), 107-114. https://doi.org/10.5093/apj2021a22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5093/apj2021a22
Tufuor, I. (2022). Due process or crime control? An examination of the limits to the right to silence in criminal proceedings in Ghana. African Human Rights Law Journal, 22(1), 187-212. https://doi.org/10.17159/1996-2096/2022/v22n1a8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/1996-2096/2022/v22n1a8
Váradi, Á. (2023). Promoting a more effective legal protection for individuals and business actors: applying the concept of fair trial to constitutional court procedures. En Czech Institute of Academic Education, Proceedings of VIAC 2023 (pp. 31-36).
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Edison Jhancarlos Mendoza Laura, Cinthia Karen Eslava de la Cruz, Fernando Emilio Escudero Vilchez, Silvia Liliana Salazar Llerena
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Los autores que participen de los procesos de evaluación y publicación de sus ediciones conservan los derechos de autor y ceden a la revista el derecho a la primera publicación, tal como establecen las condiciones de reconocimiento en la licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional (CC BY), donde los autores autorizan el libre acceso a sus obras, permitiendo que los lectores copien, distribuyan y transmitan por diversos medios, garantizando una amplia difusión del conocimiento científico publicado.
- Toda derivación, a partir de esta obra, deberá citar la fuente y a la primera publicación en esta revista. Se permiten derechos comerciales no lucrativos sobre sus contenidos.
- Los autores pueden realizar otros acuerdos contractuales independientes y adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del artículo publicado en esta revista, es decir, podrán incluirlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro, siempre que indiquen claramente que el trabajo se publicó por primera vez en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores compartir su trabajo en línea, con la finalidad de intercambios productivos para una mayor y más rápida citación del trabajo como lo establece los efectos del movimiento ‘Acceso Abierto’.
- No puede aplicar términos legales o medidas tecnológicas que restrinjan legalmente a otros de hacer cualquier cosa que permita la licencia: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.es
- La Revista Científica es financiada completamente de los aportes realizados por nuestra entidad editora: Universidad Tecnológica Israel; por tal motivo, no establece cargos o cobros de ninguna índole a sus autores y colaboradores, así como tampoco genera pagos o remuneraciones de ningún tipo a ellos.
- Se asignará un Digital Object Identifier (DOI) a cada publicación.
